ダルスケ・ウッドランズ・プリザーブ周辺のホテル

「Spacious room and breakfast area was well laid out.」

「As」

「The room was decent, moatly clean, comfortable bed, however really glad I brought my own pillow as the ones provided were badly stained with no pillowcases. It was pretty quiet generally, but the room doors didn't close without being yanked, which led to a lot of random bangs at night that scared me awake. The breakfast had very few options and any non-carpeted areas were really sticky. Did it work, yes. Would i stay there again? No.」

「I had a great experience at this hotel! The hotel room was very clean, spotless!! The staff is very very friendly. I loved the stay here, will be returning to stay here again. Upon request of extra towels, the staff was so friendly and gladly supplied us with what we requested, it was very wonderful that the hotel staff was friendly, outreaching, helpful and very wonderful! We also asked for rooms near by, they gave us rooms across one another which was very comfortable and convenient.」

「Great」

「Love this hotel」

「Staff was amazing ! 」

「This place is SO CLOSE to being a 5 star stay...but we stayed within their first month of opening, and you could tell some kinks need to be worked out. Positives: rooms are very clean, come with updated ammeneties that you would expext from a Home2 property, plus the little extras that we all like to see: streaming apps on the tv, USB and USBC charging connections in multiple locations. Beautiful showers. Negatives: there was some confusion about the status of the pool: there was a message...

「This establishment offers a charming and secure accommodation experience. The parking lot, equipped with security cameras around the putside, alleviated any concerns regarding vehicle safety. The check-in process was both efficient and straightforward, and the room itself was clean. The overall tranquility of the location was remarkable, prompting an extension of my stay. The staff demonstrated exceptional helpfulness, particularly Mr. Domney (my apologies if the spelling is incorrect). I...